View Full Version : the neon went 14.864 @92.78
badger
08-05-2004, 08:12 AM
not what i was hoping for but not too bad for full interior and 1/2 tank of gas.
no scanner, but numbers are:60'-2.139, 330'-6.200, 1/8-9.570@73.36, 1000'-12.444, 1/4-14.864@92.78. this was on drag radials.
started out running 15.09-15.15. advanced the exhaust cam, went 15.40 @91. so much for conventional wisdom. set cam gears back to 0, went 15.095. retarded both gears 2 deg., 14.864.
time to dyno it and get cam timing and A/F set.
dangahboi
08-05-2004, 08:38 AM
Nice numbers man! :thumbsup:
What do you have done to the car?
badger
08-05-2004, 09:23 AM
thanks-the list is pretty long: crane cams and valvesprings, P&P head, AEM cam gears, pacesetter header with 3" Catco cat, custom 3" exhaust with Dynomax super turbo muffler, Iceman intake, 55mm TTB, 30% underdriven aluminum crank pulley, P&P intake manifold, garden tractor battery in aluminum tray, no A/C.
14.86 was on Nitto 205/55-14 drag radials at 22 psi. the track was VERY sticky. if i'd have been able to make any more runs i'd have dropped the pressure to 18, launched at 5500 and to hell with the axles (i take spares with me)
dangahboi
08-05-2004, 09:28 AM
Pretty sweet man.
Are you running a 420A? or the A853?
I didn't see anything for fuel in that list though. What are you using for fuel control?
badger
08-05-2004, 09:44 AM
oops. i forgot the Apex-i SAFC. car ran pig rich at idle without it, fouled plugs in about 2 days.
the 2.0 is almost identical to the 420A. IIRC the head is different.
dangahboi
08-05-2004, 09:52 AM
The compression on the 420A isnt that great...
(I drive a 98 n/a Mitsu. Eclipse for a daily driver)
I have heard so many stories about turbo'd 420A's... bad news.
Yours seems to be running quite well though.
Congrats man.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.